Legal Opinion
Hess v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp.(PATH)
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 21, 1992No. Civ. A. 90-2150 (AJL)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LECHNER, District Judge.
This is a personal injury action brought by plaintiff Albert Hess (“Hess”) against defendant Port Authority Trans-Hudson (the “Port Authority”). Currently before the court is the motion of the Port Authority to dismiss the complaint (the “Com plaint”), filed 31 May 1990, 1 for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 2
For the reasons set forth below, the motion to dismiss is granted.
Facts
Hess is a citizen and resident of the State of New Jersey. Complaint, ¶ 1. Port Authority is an agency of the States of New York and New Jersey, created by an Interstate Compact to…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hess v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- 2435 Plainfield Avenue, Inc. v. Township of Scotch Plains (In Re 2435 Plainfield Avenue, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- New Jersey, Department of Environmental Protection v. Gloucester Environmental Management Services, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- Hess v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hess (Albert), Walsh (Charles F.) v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation (Path)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993