Legal Opinion
McGuire v. Schwartz
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided October 25, 1937No. 14,181PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bakke
Action by plaintiff in error to force payment of taxes on jewelry originally owned by Pauline and Harry Schechtel. The trial court found that it was only taxable for the year 1937, and plaintiff in error, on an application for a supersedeas, asks that the taxes also be imposed for the years 1933 to 1936 inclusive, while defendant in error, in joining- that this matter be decided on the application, requests that he be relieved of the payment of the 1937 taxes.
The record does not disclose how long the Schechtels had owned the jewelry, but on September 5, 1934, they pledged it (so held at trial…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State ex rel. Davis & Starr Lumber Co. v. PorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Coy v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
- Bogue v. LaughlinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Milliken v. O'MearaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
- Gibbons v. EllisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Ingersoll Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
- Dye Const. Co. v. DolanColorado Court of Appeals · 1978
- Middelkamp v. Lea TrustCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
- United States v. ElliottDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1962
- Brodhead v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953