Legal Opinion

Milliken v. O'Meara

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 7, 1924No. 10,754PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

O’Meara and others obtained a peremptory mandamus against Milliken, secretary of state, requiring him to issue a motor vehicle license to them upon payment of the required fee. He brings error.

The General Assembly passed an act (S. L. 1923, pp. 460-463), which directs that every officer who collects a registration license fee for an automobile to “require of the person applying or of some credible agent thereof, an affidavit * * * that all * * * taxes on such motor vehicle * * * due and payable at any time within the year preceding that for which such license is to be issued, have been duly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cavanaugh v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
  2. Aggers v. People ex rel. MontclairSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  3. Rhinehart v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. De Laney v. City and County of Denver Etal. In Re WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  2. Grossfield v. BaughmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  3. High v. BroadnaxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Bockweg v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. City of Denver v. Tax Research BureauSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API