Legal Opinion

McIntosh v. City of Pittsburg

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania

Decided December 19, 1901No. 16PublishedCited by 10 opinions

In Equity. On bill and plea.

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, District Judge.

This is á bill in equity, filed by Mary S. McIntosh, trustee, a citizen and resident of Iowa and a property owner on Diamond Street, in the city of Pittsburg, against said city, praying: First, that the city be enjoined from entering upon her premises and appropriating the same for a street; second, that an ordinance of said city, approved January 14, 1899, be decreed to be null and void, because it was not petitioned for by a majority in interest and number of property owners abutting on the line of the proposed improvement To the bill a plea is filed, setting…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Smith v. SwormstedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  3. Ashton v. . City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Clark v. WolfSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  5. Inhabitants of Palmyra v. MortonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Chamber of Commerce of Minneapolis v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  2. Lindsay v. AllenTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Gart v. ColeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  4. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. South Carolina Public Service AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  5. City of Saginaw v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API