Akins v. State

Ellington, Judge.

Allen D. Akins was convicted after a jury trial of two counts of child molestation, OCGA § 16-6-4 (a). He was acquitted of one count of aggravated child molestation, OCGA § 16-6-4 (c). He appeals from the denial of his motion for new trial, raising two enumerations of error: the sufficiency of the evidence, and the exclusion of testimony that one of the victims had behavioral problems at school. For the fol*121lowing reasons, we affirm.

1. Akins challenges the sufficiency of the evidence.

On appeal the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to support the verdict, and…