Kovacs v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Blackburn, Judge.
Charles Frank Kovacs appeals his convictions of driving under the influence of alcohol and driving with a suspended license, contending that there was insufficient evidence to support the convictions. He also contends that the court imposed an excessive sentence on the DUI charge.
1. Kovacs asserts there was insufficient evidence showing that he was under the influence of alcohol to the extent that he was a less safe driver. See OCGA § 40-6-391 (a) (1).
“On appeal the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to support the verdict, and appellant no longer enjoys a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Rawl v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Sumner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- McGhee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Schoicket v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Inglett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Barber v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Self v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Turner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.