Legal Opinion

Brockington v. City of Philadelphia

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 27, 2005No. Civ.A.03-5014PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.

Plaintiff Charles Broekington (“Brockington”) brought this action against defendants for violations of his state and federal constitutional rights along with other state law claims in connection with an arrest. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 for the claims that arise under federal law and pendant jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a) for the state law claims. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, and plaintiff responded with a request that defendants’ motion for summary judgment be granted in part…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Noble v. City of CamdenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
  2. Basile v. Township of SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Henderson v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Karkut v. Target Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Bush v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API