Executors of Skellenger v. of Skellenger
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On final hearing on bill, answers and proofs.
1Opinion of the Court
The Vice-Chancellor.
This is a bill for direction. The complainants, as the executors of Daniel Skelleuger, deceased, ask direction as to what they shall do with certain moneys belonging to their testator, not disposed of by his will. His estate consisted entirely of personalty. By his will, he first gave all his estate to his wife, except his moneys and securities for the payment of money, and then gave all the residue of his estate to his executors,•“ to have and to hold upon and subject to the following trusts, to wit: upon trust to invest the same at interest, on good security, and the…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Brown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
- Lawes v. LynchNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Westfield Trust Co. v. BeekmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
- Maxwell v. MaxwellNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
- Rowe v. RoweNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.