Legal Opinion

Grossman v. Sherman

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 17, 1979No. C-616PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carrigan

In 1970 the defendant Grossman, a urologist, entered into an employment contract to practice medicine as an employee of the plaintiff Colorado Urological Associates, P.C. (Associates). The contract required Grossman to pay $20,000 as liquidated damages if he engaged in competitive practice in the event of the contract’s “termination.” The trial court held that the liquidated damages clause did not survive after Grossman completed his agreed one year of employment under the contract. The court of appeals reversed. Colorado Urological Associates, P.C. v. Grossman, 34 Colo. App. 420, 529 P.2d…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Christmas v. CooleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  2. Sunshine v. M. R. Mansfield Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  3. Hutchinson v. ElderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  4. Urtado v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  5. Helmericks v. HotterColorado Court of Appeals · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Industrial Claim Appeals Office v. Softrock Geological Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2014
  2. Burke v. FineCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  3. Niles v. Builders Service & Supply, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Kaiser v. WrightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  5. Bishop and Diocese of Colorado v. MoteColorado Court of Appeals · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API