Legal Opinion

In re Swentosky

Tuscarawas County Probate Court

Decided December 6, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By LAMNECK, J.

This is a proceeding in habeas corpus brought by the relator, Helen Swentosky, a minor aged eighteen years, of Luciusboro, Pennsylvania, through her stepfather and next friend, Joseph Swentosky, to recover the custody of her illegitimate *602child, Louise Ellen Swentosky, aged eighteen months, who the relator claims is being unlawfully detained by William and Ruth Meyers of 410 Cross Street, Uhrichsville, Ohio.

It appears from the evidence that Helen Swentosky came to the home of Mrs. Mary Burmich, an old friend, in Gnadenhutten, Ohio, with her child, from Luciusboro,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stapleton v. PoynterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  2. Mestetzko v. Elf Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Dunkin v. SeifertSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. In re BushSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re MurrayOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re DuffyOhio Court of Appeals · 1946
  3. Ex parte Combs, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API