Legal Opinion

Bobbitt v. State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 23, 1933No. 31,595PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This is an original action in mandamus. Defendants filed a motion to quash the alternative writ. .A decision on that motion will settle the action.

The relief sought is to compel the state highway commission to construct U. S. highway No. 36 along a designated route in Washington county. Plaintiffs allege that this route is the one designated in 1926 by the county commissioners and the state highway commission as part of the state system of highways. They point out that the state highway commission is about to construct highway 36 along a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bobbett v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  2. Heller v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  3. Craft v. Com'rs Jackson Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  4. Home Riverside Coal Mines Co. v. McAuliffeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  5. Clark v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Funk Jewelry Co. v. State Ex Rel. La PradeArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Hill v. Kansas State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  3. Dennis v. State Board of Barber ExaminersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  4. Depew v. Wichita Retail Credit Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API