Legal Opinion

Hawes v. Luhr Bros., Inc.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 2004No. 96153PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kilbride

After entering a voluntary dismissal order, the circuit court of St. Clair County allowed plaintiffs motion to reinstate his complaint for damages under the Jones Act (46 U.S.C. § 688 et seq.). The initial order of voluntary dismissal was without prejudice, but it did not specifically reserve to plaintiff the right to reinstate. The defendant appealed (155 Ill. 2d R. 301), claiming that the trial court had no jurisdiction to allow the reinstatement. The appellate court affirmed in an unpublished opinion. No. 5 — 01—0952 (unpublished order under Supreme Court Rule 23). We granted leave to…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Barnett v. Zion Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Zimmerman v. Village of SkokieIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Midstate Siding and Window Co. v. RogersIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Weisguth v. Supreme Tribe of Ben HurIllinois Supreme Court · 1916

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Mikolajczyk v. Ford Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2008
  2. People v. WardIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Alternate Fuels, Inc. v. Director of Illinois Environmental Protection AgencyIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Jackson v. Callan Publishing, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  5. BHI Corp. v. Litgen Concrete Cutting & Coring Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2005

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API