Legal Opinion

Schaub Ex Rel. Schaub v. Moerke

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1983No. 13900PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

Appellants, Marjory and Francis Schaub, filed suit on behalf of their minor sons, Paul and Charles, for injuries sustained by Paul and Charles and medical expenses incurred as a result of the collision between a fire truck owned by the city of Aberdeen (City) and driven by Terry Ellingson and a vehicle occupied by Paul and Charles.*

City and Ellingson filed motions to dismiss based on the doctrine of sovereign immunity, submitting a brief in support of their motions. Appellants’ brief…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. James v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  2. National Bank of South Dakota v. LeirSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Conway v. HumbertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Sioux Falls Construction Co. v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. RuthSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Norwest Bank Black Hills, N.A. v. Rapid City Teachers Federal Credit Union (No. 4122)South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Eide v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Sioux Enterprises, Minnesota v. Tri-State Refining Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Aune v. B-Y Water DistrictSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Aune v. B-Y Water DistrictSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API