Sioux Enterprises, Minnesota v. Tri-State Refining Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON, Justice.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This case concerns issues that were raised, or should have been raised, in Tri-State Refining and Inv. Co., Inc. v. Apaloosa Co., 431 N.W.2d 311 (S.D.1988) (Tri-State I). It should be noted that after remand, we heard this case again in Tri-State Refining and Inv. Co., Inc. v. Apaloosa Co., 452 N.W.2d 104 (S.D.1990).
Tri-State I was an action filed by TriState, as the real party in interest after Robert Hoff conveyed his rights to it in 1981 (Tri-State I, at 313). The complaint, often amended, alleged that Lorentz Op-dahl (and Apaloosa, a trust he had…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Black Hills Jewelry Manufacturing Co. v. Felco Jewel Industries, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Tri-State Refining & Investment Co. v. Apaloosa Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Tri-State Refining & Investment Co. v. Apaloosa Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Olesen v. SnyderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Schaub Ex Rel. Schaub v. MoerkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sioux Valley Hospital Ass'n v. South Dakota State Board of EqualizationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Tri-State Refining & Investment Co. v. OpdahlCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1991
- Glover v. KrambeckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Glover v. KrambeckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Lewton v. McCauleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.