Legal Opinion

Sioux Enterprises, Minnesota v. Tri-State Refining Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1990No. 16577PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Justice.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

This case concerns issues that were raised, or should have been raised, in Tri-State Refining and Inv. Co., Inc. v. Apaloosa Co., 431 N.W.2d 311 (S.D.1988) (Tri-State I). It should be noted that after remand, we heard this case again in Tri-State Refining and Inv. Co., Inc. v. Apaloosa Co., 452 N.W.2d 104 (S.D.1990).

Tri-State I was an action filed by TriState, as the real party in interest after Robert Hoff conveyed his rights to it in 1981 (Tri-State I, at 313). The complaint, often amended, alleged that Lorentz Op-dahl (and Apaloosa, a trust he had…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Black Hills Jewelry Manufacturing Co. v. Felco Jewel Industries, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Tri-State Refining & Investment Co. v. Apaloosa Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Tri-State Refining & Investment Co. v. Apaloosa Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Olesen v. SnyderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Schaub Ex Rel. Schaub v. MoerkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sioux Valley Hospital Ass'n v. South Dakota State Board of EqualizationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Tri-State Refining & Investment Co. v. OpdahlCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1991
  3. Glover v. KrambeckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Glover v. KrambeckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Lewton v. McCauleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API