Legal Opinion
Garr v. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided December 18, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant, The Kelly-Springfield Tire Company, is a corporation organized October 29th, 1932, under the laws of the State of New Jersey. It was formed by consolidation of Kelly-Springfield Tire Company, a corporation organized on April 15th, 1899, under the laws of the State of New Jersey, and Kelspring Corporation, a corporation organized in 1932 under the laws of the State of New Jersey. The defendant company is engaged principally in the business of manufacturing and selling automobile, motor truck and carriage tires, and rubber products.
The complainant Ernst Garr is the owner of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kelly v. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
- Reinhardt v. Inter-State Telephone Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1906
- Jennings v. Studebaker Corp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
3Cited by2 opinions
- Laredef Corp. v. Fed. Seaboard Terra CottaNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
- In Re Distillers Factors CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1950