Legal Opinion

Whitney v. Taylor

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California

Decided January 12, 1891PublishedCited by 1 opinion

At Law.

1Opinion of the CourtHawley, J.

This is an action of ejectment. The cause was tried before the court without a jury. The plaintiff claims title under a deed from the Central Pacific Railroad Company. The land in question is situate in the odd-numbered sections which were granted to the railroad company by the act of congress of July 1, 1862. 12 U. S. St. 489.' This land, under and by virtue of said act of congress, became vested in the railroad company on the 26th day of March', 1864, when the map of the definite location of said railroad was filed in the proper department at Washington, unless it had been “sold, reserved,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hastings & Dakota Railroad v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. DunmeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Newhall v. SangerSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Water and Mining Co. v. BugbeySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. B. & M. R. R. v. AbinkNebraska Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Garrard v. Silver Peak MinesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API