Sorensen v. Mosbacher
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.
The following plat attached to appellant’s.brief will aid to an understanding of the controversy.
The northerly tract appearing thereon is the property of the plaintiff, and comprises between three and four acres of ground. The other two tracts comprise the property of the defendants. Only the middle tract appearing on the plat is involved in the controversy. The description of each of these tracts is by metes and bounds, and the description of each of the three tracts is, to some extent, mutually dependent upon the description of the others. The plat indicates the triangular strip involved in…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Minear v. Keith Furnace Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- Waldorf v. ColeWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Kemmerer v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
- Parizek Ex Rel. Greazel v. KleinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
- Holmgren v. BondhusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976