Legal Opinion
Echols v. Strickland
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided November 4, 1981No. Civ. A. No. B-79-99PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KAZEN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Herb Strickland, Tommy Wilson, Brig Marmolejo and the County of Hidalgo, Texas, on the grounds that the cause of action alleged against them is barred by the statute of limitations. Art. 5526, V.A.T.S. The events complained of occurred on May 1, 1977. Plaintiff’s Original Complaint was filed on April 27, 1979, within the two-year limitations period. However, as pointed out in this Court’s Memorandum and Order of September 26,1980, this Court is directed to apply not only the applicable…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Familias Unidas, an Unincorporated Association, and Irma Torrez v. Dolph BriscoeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Rigo Manufacturing Company v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hargett v. Valley Federal Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- Kester v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Devils Lake Sioux Tribe v. North DakotaDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1989
- Shemwell v. CannonDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2019
- Harvey v. CottenDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.