Legal Opinion

In Re Herman

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 10, 1991No. 90-815PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEADMAN, Associate Judge:

Appellant was involuntarily admitted to St. Elizabeths Hospital for emergency observation and diagnosis under D.C.Code § 21-521 (1989). The application was signed by a physician who, appellant asserts, did not meet the prerequisites set forth in that section and § 582(b).1

At a hearing pursuant to § 525, the trial court found that probable cause had been established to believe that “respondent is mentally ill, and, because of that illness, is likely to injure herself unless immediately hospitalized.” Accordingly, the court authorized continued emergency observation…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re MorrisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Williams v. MeredithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. In re DeLoatchDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Matter of RosellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. In Re MeltonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of HermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. In Re HermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Matter of HermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Matter of HermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API