Legal Opinion

Williams v. Meredith

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 2, 1979No. 79-301, 79-302 and 79-340PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Chief Judge:

Appellants, who have been deemed to be mentally ill and a danger to themselves and to others, were hospitalized involuntarily under an emergency commitment procedure and are currently in confinement at Saint Elizabeths Hospital. Appellee Meredith is the Superintendent of Saint Elizabeths Hospital. Appellees Ruffin, Murphy, and D’Amore are the physician-members of the Commission on Mental Health who made the application for emergency hospitalization in each case. 1 Appellants urge that their confinement is illegal and that the trial court should have issued their requested…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Johnnie Barnard, PatientCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Gooden v. Howard CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  2. Gooden v. Howard County, MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  3. In Re MorrisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. In re DeLoatchDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Matter of RosellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API