Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Miller v. American Professional Marketing, Inc.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 19, 1986No. 85-141PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHULTZ, Justice.

Defendants appeal from a district court determination that their multilevel marketing programs are illegal referral sales plans. The court permanently enjoined defendants’ sales practices in the state. In this appeal, defendants assert that their programs are neither pyramiding nor illegal referral merchandise sales plans banned by Iowa Code section 714.16(2). We agree with defendants’ contention and reverse the trial court’s ruling.

The attorney general commenced this action on behalf of the State against two corporations and its officers. Although the two corporations, one…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Turner v. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  2. Ger-Ro-Mar, Inc., a Corporation D/B/A Symbra'ette, and Carl G. Simonsen, Individually and as President of Ger-Ro-Mar, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. TollesonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Edmisten, Attorney General v. Challenge, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Turner v. F. T. CCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Gold Unlimited, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  2. State Ex Rel. Miller v. Santa Rosa Sales & MarketingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  3. Chapel Hill Spa Health Club, Inc. v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  4. Jackson v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2025
  5. United States v. Gold Unlimited, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API