Tresa Megenity v. David Dunn
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Statement of the Case
NAJAM, Judge.
[1] Tresa Megenity appeals the trial courts entry of summary judgment in favor of David Dunn on Megenity’s complaint, in which she alleged that Dunn was negligent and reckless and proximately caused her serious bodily injury during a karate practice session. Megenity presents a single issue for our review, namely, whether there exists a genuine issue of material fact precluding summary judgment in favor of Dunn.
[2] We reverse and remand for further proceedings.1
Facts and Procedural History
[3] On December 1, 2012, Megenity and Dunn were students at Terry…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Antonio Hughley v. State of Indiana, The Consolidated City of Indianapolis/Marion County, and The Indianapolis Metropolitan Police DepartmentIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
- Williams v. TharpIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
- Kroger Co. v. PlonskiIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- Pfenning v. LinemanIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
- McSwane v. Bloomington Hospital & Healthcare SystemIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tresa Megenity v. David DunnIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
- David D. Wooten v. Caesars Riverboat Casino, LLC and Bernard J. ChamernikIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016