Legal Opinion

David D. Wooten v. Caesars Riverboat Casino, LLC and Bernard J. Chamernik

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 15, 2016No. 31A04-1605-CT-1037PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

[1] Appellant-Plaintiff, David D. Wooten (Wooten), appeals the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of Appellee-Defendant, 1 Bernard J. Chamernik (Cham-ernik), which concluded, as a matter of law, that Chamernik’s actions fell within the range of ordinary behavior of participants in the sport of golf.

[2] We affirm.

ISSUE

[3] Wooten raises two issues on appeal, which we consolidate and restate as: Whether the trial court properly concluded that Chamernik’s conduct of driving the golf cart during a golf scramble fell within the ordinary range of behavior of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. PGA Tour, Inc. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Williams v. TharpIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Rhodes v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Pfenning v. LinemanIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  5. First Farmers Bank & Trust Co. v. WhorleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kenneth Bertin v. Douglas MannMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Tresa Megenity v. David DunnIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Bassuk v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2020
  4. ELLIS v. HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENTDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020
  5. Katherine Fraze v. The Floyd County Health Department and The City of New Albany Department of Animal Control (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API