David D. Wooten v. Caesars Riverboat Casino, LLC and Bernard J. Chamernik
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
[1] Appellant-Plaintiff, David D. Wooten (Wooten), appeals the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of Appellee-Defendant, 1 Bernard J. Chamernik (Cham-ernik), which concluded, as a matter of law, that Chamernik’s actions fell within the range of ordinary behavior of participants in the sport of golf.
[2] We affirm.
ISSUE
[3] Wooten raises two issues on appeal, which we consolidate and restate as: Whether the trial court properly concluded that Chamernik’s conduct of driving the golf cart during a golf scramble fell within the ordinary range of behavior of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- PGA Tour, Inc. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Williams v. TharpIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
- Rhodes v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Pfenning v. LinemanIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
- First Farmers Bank & Trust Co. v. WhorleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kenneth Bertin v. Douglas MannMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
- Tresa Megenity v. David DunnIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
- Bassuk v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2020
- ELLIS v. HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENTDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020
- Katherine Fraze v. The Floyd County Health Department and The City of New Albany Department of Animal Control (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017