Legal Opinion

Cheryl Dalton v. Teva North America

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 4, 2018No. 17-1990PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Barrett, Circuit Judge.

Cheryl Dalton appeals the summary judgment entered against her in this products liability case. The district court held that Dalton's claims failed under Indiana law because she did not provide expert evidence on the issue of causation. Dalton contends that she did not have to provide expert evidence because the cause of her injuries would be readily apparent to a lay juror. Because the district court correctly applied Indiana law, we affirm.

I

In 2007, Dalton's doctor implanted a ParaGard Intrauterine Device ("IUD") in her uterus. An IUD is a form of long-term birth…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Puffer v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  3. Kenneth A. McCready v. Ebay, Inc., Bruce Kamminga, and David McDuffeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  4. Carl E. Thomas v. Guardsmark, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  5. Myers v. Illinois Central RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Christine Dancel v. Groupon, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  2. Pain Center of SE Indiana, LLC v. Origin Healthcare Solutions LLCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  3. Britney S. v. BerryhillDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019
  4. Viamedia, Inc. v. Comcast Corp.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. A. S. v. FREEDOM GROUP, INC.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API