Matteson v. Director of Revenue
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
COVINGTON, Judge.
Orval and Florence Matteson filed a petition before the Administrative Hearing Commission (AHC) seeking review of the Director of Revenue’s final decision denying their refund claim and determining that they owed additional 1988 Missouri income tax, interest, and additions. The Mattesons claimed that the Missouri tax scheme unfairly discriminates against nonresidents. They also claimed that they were entitled to a deduction for timber expenses accumulated in years in which they did not file a Missouri income tax return. The AHC rejected the Mattesons’ contention on the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Maxwell v. BugbeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Brown Group, Inc. v. Administrative Hearing CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Community Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
- Brady v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Bridge Data Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bachtel v. Miller County Nursing Home DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- In the Matter of: Trenton Farms RE, LLC Permit No. MOGS10500 v. Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Hickory Neighbors United, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Jones v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- Whitehead v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- Dyno Nobel, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.