Legal Opinion
United States v. Rory Doremus and David Doremus
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 31, 1989No. 87-3831PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POOLE, Circuit Judge:
Appellants Rory and David Doremus were convicted of violating United States Forest Service regulations which prohibit “[djamaging any natural feature or other property of the United States” (36 C.F.R. § 261.9(a) (1987)) and “[vjiolating any term or condition of ... [an] approved operating plan” (36 C.F.R. § 261.10(k) (1987)). On appeal, appellants contend that their activity was permissible as “reasonably incident” to their mining operation (see 30 U.S.C. § 612 (1982)) and that the regulations are unconstitutionally vague. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
Appellants…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. HostetterSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schwartzmiller v. GardnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Easyriders Freedom F.I.G.H.T. v. HanniganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Thomas E. Iverson, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Bing Sun Patte Sun All Ports, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. James T. TabaccaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gordon Paul COOPER, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.