Legal Opinion

Lamar Outdoor Advertising v. Farmers Co-Op Oil Co. of Sheridan

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 2009No. S-08-0131PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

[T1] During litigation among Lamar Outdoor Advertising (Lamar), Farmers Co-Op Oil Company of Sheridan, Wyoming (Farmers), and Maverik Country Stores (Maverik) 1 concerning Lamar's claim that the other parties had not honored Lamar's lease-based right of first refusal that provided Lamar the opportunity to purchase certain property upon which Lamar maintained an advertising sign, the parties executed a settlement agreement, the meaning of one provision of which is now before us in this appeal. Lamar appeals the district court's summary judgment order that under the terms of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pace v. CapobiancoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  2. Lopez Carrasquillo v. RubianesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  3. Hatton v. Energy Electric Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Cranston v. Weston County Weed & Pest BoardWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Rino v. MeadWyoming Supreme Court · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Windham v. WindhamWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Lucero ex rel. Lucero v. HolbrookWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  3. M & M Auto Outlet v. Hill Investment Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Graus v. OK Investments, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  5. James Baker v. Stephanie BakerWyoming Supreme Court · 2023

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API