State v. Palmer
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM. 1
11 Charged by bill of information with possession of a Schedule III controlled substance with intent to distribute in violation of La.R.S. 40:968(A), defendant moved to suppress the evidence, 56 pills of Lortab, seized by the police on June 6, 2007. After a hearing conducted on October 24, 2007, the trial court denied the motion with written reasons. Defendant sought review in the Third Circuit, which granted his writ and overturned the ruling of the trial court. State v. Palmer, 08-0621 (La.App. 3rd Cir.12/10/08), 1 So.3rd 689. We granted the state’s writ of review to consider…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
- State v. KinchenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- State v. BarabinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- State v. JonesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- State v. MarshallLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.