Legal Opinion

Caplan v. Brandriet

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1934No. File No. 7670PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPo'Leey, J.

This action was brought to recover on three promissory notes. The defendants B. H. and Catherine Brandriet appeared in the action and moved for a change of place of trial. This motion was denied1, and neither of said defendants made any further appearance in the case. The defendant school district appeared and answered to the merits. After issue was joined, it was agreed between plaintiff and the said defendant that the case might -be tried to the court without a jury and that the case should be brought on for trial upon notice by either of the parties. Thereafter notice of the time when the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Caplan v. BrandrietSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Boshart v. National Benefit Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Canton Concrete Products Corp. v. AlderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Canton Concrete Products Corp. v. AlderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  4. In re the Appeal of Lawrence CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API