Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ballow

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 1952No. Appeal, 245PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ross, J.,

This is an appeal by George Ballow from judgment of sentence imposed after the refusal of a new trial following a conviction by a jury on a bill of indictment containing five counts charging assault with intent to rob and robbery of Martin Barlly and Albert Godfrey. Morris Berkowitz and Oliver Krantz were also indicted for the same offenses but they entered pleas of guilty and testified for the Commonwealth against Ballow. The appellant questions (1) the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict and (2) the action of the trial judge in allowing an amendment…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BillingsleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Commonwealth v. SchusterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Commonwealth v. LiebowitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Commonwealth v. TassoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  5. Commonwealth v. BubnaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CohanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Commonwealth v. BushkoffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Commonwealth v. ThompsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Commonwealth v. PresselSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Commonwealth v. GladdenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API