Central Freight Lines, Inc. v. Sadler
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
BLAIR, Justice.
This litigation arose as an appeal under the Motor Carrier Act (Vernon’s Ann.Civ. St. Art. 911b, Sec. 20), from an order of the Railroad Commission granting appellee, Comet Motor Freight Lines, a corporation, a certificate of convenience and necessity to operate a certain common carrier motor carrier service. Appellants, several railroad and motor carrier companies serving parts of the territory involved, unsuccessfully sought in the trial court and here seek to set aside the order granting the certificate and to enjoin any operation under it, contending as follows:
1. That the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Shupee v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Railroad Commission of Texas v. ShupeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Mayor of Houston v. Houston City Street Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1892
- Railroad Commission v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Texas Motor Coaches, Inc. v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alamo Express, Inc. v. Union City TransferTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- North East Texas Motor Lines, Inc. v. Texas & Pacific Motor Transport Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Merchants Fast Motor Lines, Inc. v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Application of Transport, Inc. of South DakotaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954