Legal Opinion

Esteph v. Grumm

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 13, 2008No. 07CA6PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harsha, Judge.

{¶ 1} This case deals with easements to and purported encroachments upon a driveway shared by adjacent property owners and a pipeline company. William Grumm appeals the entry of a partial summary judgment in favor of William and Cheryl Esteph and Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C., who seek a declaration of the location of the easements. Because there is a genuine issue of material fact concerning whether the obstructions that Grumm placed in the shared driveway are within the “easement area” specified in the survey descriptions of the mutual easement, summary judgment in favor of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Doe v. ShafferOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Bostic v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Aultman Hospital Ass'n v. Community Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Clark v. ButlerOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Comtide Holdings, LLC v. Booth Creek Management Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
  3. Yoppolo v. Allen (In Re Allen)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
  4. Hawkins v. CreechOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Dassel v. HershbergerOhio Court of Appeals · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API