Legal Opinion

Titus v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 2, 1905Published

Appeal from Marshall District Court. — '■Hon. Obed Caswell, Judge. Suit to recover double damages for killing plaintiffs horse. Trial to a jury, and verdict and judgment for the plaintiff The defendant appeals.—

1Opinion of the CourtSherwin, C. J.

The plaintiff’s horse went from a pasture through a gate in the defendant’s right of way fence and was killed by one of its trains. The gate was an ordinary sliding one, sixteen feet long, four 6-inch boards in width, and was fastened by slipping the front end between .two posts placed about six inches apart. The surface of the ground was nearly or quite level, but the heel of the gate was raised above it from three to seven inches, and, when closed, the- front end rested on the ground. The two upper boards of the gate were about fourteen inches apart. The proof is conclusive that the gate…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hudson v. C., & N. W. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  2. McKinley v. C., R. I. & P. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  3. Koenigs v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  4. Mears v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  5. Shellabarger v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API