Legal Opinion

Koenigs v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 13, 1895PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Shelby District Court. — Hon. A. B. Thornell, Judge. Action to recover double damages for stock injured, also for stock killed. Trial by jury. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtKinne, J.

I. Plaintiff was in the years 1890 and 1891, the owner of a farm lying about one-half mile north and east of defendant’s station called “Earling,” in Shelby county, Iowa. The railroad track ran through said farm from northeast to southwest. On the south and east side of defendant’s line of railway, and adjoining its right of way, plaintiff had a pasture wherein the stock claimed to have been killed, was kept. There was a gate in the, company’s right of way fence, which opened from said pasture into the right of way. The petition charges that about September 15, 1890, the defendant, by one of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Asbach v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  2. Morris v. C., B. & Q. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  3. Wheelan v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  4. Schaefert v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  5. Blair v. Madison CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1890

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of GoldthorpSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  2. Faivre v. MandercheidSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. Huss v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  4. Kling v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  5. Ludwig v. BlackshereSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API