Legal Opinion

Charles E. Pillette v. Dale Foltz & Frank Kelley

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 23, 1987No. 86-1245PublishedCited by 194 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petitioner Charles E. Pillette appeals from a district court order dismissing without prejudice his habeas corpus petition for failure to fully exhaust state remedies. Petitioner first argues that he has sufficiently exhausted available state remedies with regard to his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. He secondly argues in the alternative that even if his state remedies have not been exhausted, he should not be required to pursue them because any further attempt to obtain redress for his claim would be futile. For the reasons which follow, we affirm.

I

In…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Granberry v. GreerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Earl Wayne Wiley v. Dewey Sowders, Superintendent, Kentucky State ReformatoryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by194 opinions

  1. Wagner v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. Theodore J. Lyons v. Clarice StovallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  3. Carrie C. Wong v. Christine Money, Warden Attorney General of the State of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  4. Robert Lee Caver v. Dennis M. Straub, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  5. Michael Hicks v. Dennis M. Straub, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

189 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API