Haydon v. Haydon
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Little River Circuit Court; James S. Steel, Judge; 1. The demurrer should have been overruled. All persons who have an interest may be joined as plaintiffs. Kirby’s Digest, § § 6005, 6229; 79 Ark. 64; 79 Ark. 181; Bliss, Code PI. § 74; 50 Ark. 64. 2. The complaint states a cause of action. Kirby’s Dig. § 6091.
1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, C. J.
This is an action instituted in the circuit court of Tittle River County by Mattie Haydon in her own right and as administratrix of the estate of her deceased husband, Enoch Haydon, against the estate of D. R. Haydon, deceased, to recover the value of certain crops of cotton, corn and alfalfa, the property of the plaintiffs, alleged to have been wrongfully converted by said D. R. Haydon, to his own use.
It is alleged in the complaint that Enoch Haydon had, for several years prior to his death on April 11, 1905, been in actual possession as his home of the land on which said crops were grown;…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Ping v. KershawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Irby v. DowdySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
- McGraw v. MillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931