Legal Opinion

Ping v. Kershaw

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 13, 1923No. 11099PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff in error against the defendant in error for the conversion of some hay. Parties will hereinafter be referred to as plaintiff and defendant as they appeared in thé trial court.

The trial court' instructed the jury to return a verdict for the defendant, which was done, and judgment rendered thereon.

The plaintiff contended that he rented 60 acres of land for the year 1918 from Mrs. Ida' Miley,' and that the defendant wrongfully converted the hay grown on such lands. The defendant claims that the testimony shows that the plaintiff never had a valid rental…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Draper v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  2. Donahue v. ShippeeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1887
  3. Gardner v. BootheSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
  4. Pruitt v. GunnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  5. Leidy v. CarsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bane v. Anderson, Bryant & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Preas v. PhebusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  3. Belcher v. SpohnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Thompson v. MOBIL PRODUCING COMPANYDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1958
  5. Bane v. Anderson, Bryant & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API