Ping v. Kershaw
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.
This action was brought by the plaintiff in error against the defendant in error for the conversion of some hay. Parties will hereinafter be referred to as plaintiff and defendant as they appeared in thé trial court.
The trial court' instructed the jury to return a verdict for the defendant, which was done, and judgment rendered thereon.
The plaintiff contended that he rented 60 acres of land for the year 1918 from Mrs. Ida' Miley,' and that the defendant wrongfully converted the hay grown on such lands. The defendant claims that the testimony shows that the plaintiff never had a valid rental…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Draper v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Donahue v. ShippeeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1887
- Gardner v. BootheSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
- Pruitt v. GunnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- Leidy v. CarsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bane v. Anderson, Bryant & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Preas v. PhebusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Belcher v. SpohnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Thompson v. MOBIL PRODUCING COMPANYDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1958
- Bane v. Anderson, Bryant & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.