Louis F. Dow Co. v. First National Bank
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1DissentBrown, C. J.
(dissenting.)
I dissent: The Sheldons, as stated in the opinion of the court, were the officers and agents of defendant, residing and performing their duties to the bank at their offices in the city of Minneapolis, *25this state. They were the controlling owners of the bank, and had authority to and in fact entered into the contracts in question at their offices in this state, and thereby bound the bank to the obligations thus created. Plaintiff, a Minnesota corporation, with its place of business also in this state, fully performed the contracts and during the time thereof, extending over a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. of Texas v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Hunter v. Mutual Reserve Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Atkinson v. United States Operating Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- State v. United States Mutual Accident Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
- Ben Franklin Insurance v. GillettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.