Legal Opinion

Joseph Martin, Inc. v. McNulty

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 28, 1938PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

This is an action of contract in which the plaintiff seeks to recover damages for the breach of an alleged oral agreement between the parties. The case was heard by a jury which found for the plaintiff. The defendant’s exceptions are to the denial of his motion for a directed verdict and to the refusal of the trial judge to give certain rulings of law. The defendant pleaded the statute of frauds.

*574The jury could have found that, in December, 1932, the defendant purchased at auction a large tract of undeveloped land in Marblehead, the deed to which was delivered on January 2 or 3, 1933, and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Doyle v. DixonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  2. Somerby v. BuntinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  3. Wellington v. ApthorpMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  4. Rowland v. HackelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  5. Drew v. WiswallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Loranger Construction Corp. v. E. F. Hauserman Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
  2. Novel Iron Works, Inc. v. Wexler Construction Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  3. Phoenix Spring Beverage Co. v. Harvard Brewing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. Joseph B. Doherty, Sr. v. Doherty Insurance Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  5. Meng v. Trustees of Boston UniversityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API