Crowell v. Baker Oil Tools, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment dismissing a suit for declaratory judgment determining the validity of Patent No. 1,748,007 for a guiding, floating and cementing device for well casings, now owned by appellee Baker Oil Tools, Inc. Appellees answered appellant’s complaint and then took appellant’s deposition under Rule 26 (a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.
After taking the deposition (basing their motion upon the pleadings on file in the case and the admissions and statements of the appellant in his deposition),…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Treemond Co. v. Schering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Crowell v. Baker Oil Tools, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1943
3Cited by33 opinions
- Societe De Conditionnement en Aluminium v. Hunter Engineering Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Aralac, Inc. v. Hat Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Super Products Corporation, a Wisconsin Corporation v. D P Way Corporation, a Wisconsin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Wembley, Inc. v. Superba Cravats, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Technical Tape Corp. v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.