Legal Opinion

Mardirosian v. American Institute of Architects

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 25, 1979No. Civ. A. 77-1297PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SIRICA, District Judge.

This case presents an antitrust challenge to the ethical canons of a professional organization. Plaintiff Aram H. Mardirosian, an architect, filed the action in July 1977 after being suspended from membership in the American Institute of Architects (AIA). Mardirosian seeks treble damages against both the AIA, which found him guilty of violating two of its ethical standards, and Seymour Auerbach, the architect who filed charges of ethical misconduct with the AIA. Plaintiff also seeks injunctive relief against the AIA. An amended complaint was filed on May 18,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. National Society of Professional Engineers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Short v. DemopolisWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Feldman v. GreenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. CITY OF MOUNDRIDGE, KS. v. Exxon Mobil Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  4. Sherwood Van Lines, Inc. v. United States Department of the NavyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1990
  5. Circo v. Spanish Gardens Food Manufacturing Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API