Legal Opinion

Hannie v. Guidry

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 6, 2010No. 10-216PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID E. CHATELAIN, * Judge.

I,The defendant driver and his insurer appeal the trial court’s determination that the driver was 100% at fault for a center turn lane collision between his vehicle and the plaintiffs. Finding no manifest error in the trial court’s findings of fact, we affirm its assessment of fault and its general damage award. We also deny the plaintiffs damages and attorney fees request for a frivolous appeal.

FACTS

On November 28, 2003, vehicles driven by Nicol Hannie and Ray Guidry collided in the center turn lane on Kaliste Saloom Road in Lafayette as Mr. Hannie attempted to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  3. Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  4. Evans v. LungrinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  5. Rando v. Anco Insulations Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Walley v. VargasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Harvey v. City of Eunice Police DepartmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Caldwell v. Anpac Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Central Electric Co. of Alexandria v. England Economic & Industrial Development DistrictLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Gregory Mouton v. Encompass Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API