Legal Opinion
Richards v. Tompkins County
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 3, 2011PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGarry, J.
Petitioners own real property in Tompkins County located along County Road 109, also known as Hanshaw Road. Respondent determined that a portion of that road had become deteriorated and unsafe, so it developed a plan (hereinafter the project), through its consultants, to improve and resurface that portion and to construct a sidewalk. As the project required respondent to acquire property along the roadway, respondent published notice of a public hearing in the local newspaper (see EDPL 202 [A]), mailed notice to 78 property owners (see EDPL 202 [C]), and conducted a public hearing in March…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lucenti v. Cayuga Apartments, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Broadway Schenectady Entertainment, Inc. v. County of SchenectadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- City of Mechanicville v. Town of HalfmoonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Tadasky Corp. v. Village of EllenvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- SKEK ASSOCIATES v. BenensonNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Matter of Court St. Dev. Project, LLC v. Utica Urban Renewal AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- City of Plattsburgh v. WeedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Matter of Smithline v. Town & Vil. of HarrisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- City of Plattsburgh v. WeedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Matter of Uncle Sam Garages, LLC v. Capital Dist. Transp. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019