Legal Opinion
SKEK ASSOCIATES v. Benenson
New York Court of Appeals
Decided September 21, 2006PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Motion, insofar as made by Esther Benenson, Michael Benenson and Sharon Benenson for leave to appeal, dismissed upon the ground that they are not parties aggrieved (CPLR 5511); motion, insofar as made by Flushing Manor Care Center, Inc. for leave to appeal, denied.
2Cited by7 opinions
- Eastern Niagara Project Power Alliance v. New York State Department of Environmental ConservationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Tadasky Corp. v. Village of EllenvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Richards v. Tompkins CountyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. FarringtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- LM BUSINESS ASSOCIATES, INC. v. STATE OF NEW YORKAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.