Ex Parte Brooks
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
LIVINGSTON, Justice.
The question in this proceeding is whether the authority conferred by sections 457 and 459, Title 7, Code of 1940, authorizes prior to the trial the taking of the depositions (either orally or by interrogatories) of a.woman litigant, at the instance and option of the party opposing her in the litigation.
To so hold would authorize such opposing party to require an oral examination of her, and thereby put her at a disadvantage in conducting her suit.
It seems to be generally held that a party may be used as a witness for his opponent and.be required to give evidence of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Barfield v. South Highlands InfirmarySupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Ex Parte CrossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
- Winter v. ElmoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- Olive v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874
- Ex Parte ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Keith v. PadenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- McCollum v. Birmingham Post Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- American Life Ins. Co. v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Ex parte JoinerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Hughes v. HughesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.