Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Cross

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 12, 1945No. 3 Div. 426PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

The controversy here relates to an effort by the petitioner, to whom we will refer as plaintiff, to perpetuate the testimony of a witness under sections 491 et seq., Title 7, Code of 1940. Those statutes have remained the same in all our codes, including the first, 1852. Section 492 is as follows:

“The applicant must make affidavit before a circuit or probate judge, or register stating:
“That he is a party or expects to be a party, to a suit, either at law or equity, in a court of this state.
“That the testimony of a witness, whose name and place of residence is stated, is…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ballard v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Griffin v. ProctorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  3. Gill v. MoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  4. Lucas v. PittmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  5. Ferrell v. RossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Colonial Life and Accident Insurance Co. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  2. McCollum v. Birmingham Post Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Belyeu v. BomanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  4. American Life Ins. Co. v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  5. Ex Parte Monroe County BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API