Hermitage Special School District v. Ingalls Special School District
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Bradley Circuit Court; Turner Butler, Judge; The act does not violate article 5, section 22 of the Constitution. It is not unconstitutional. 120 .¿Irk. 165; 125 Id. 165; 49 Id. 131; 61 Id. 625; 76 Id. 197; 100 Id. 178; 75 Id. 125. The act is unconstitutional and void. Article 5, section 22, Constitution. 89 Ark. 598; 109 Id. 556; 13 Mich. 481.
1Opinion of the CourtMcCULLOCH, C. J.
A school district designated as Hermitage Special School District was created by an act of the General Assembly of 1907 of territory embraced in a certain common school district in Bradley county. Acts' of 1907, page 962. Section 1 of the statute merely provided that “all the territory now embraced in school district No. 12 in Bradley County, Arkansas, be and the same is hereby organized into a special school district to be known and designated as Hermitage Special School District. ’ ’ There were other sections of the statute conferring certain powers on the special 'school district thus…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- State v. McKinleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- State ex rel. Attorney General v. TrulockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hobbs-Western Co. v. CarmicalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
- Farris v. WrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Texarkana-Forest Park Paving, Water, Sewer and Gas District No. 1 v. State Use Miller County.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- Boyer v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
- Johnson v. PinkleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.