Legal Opinion

Larson v. City of Algood

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided July 3, 2019No. 2:17-cv-00079; NO. 2:17-cv-00080; NO. 2:18-cv-00022PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

In these three consolidated actions,1 Defendants have filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on all of Plaintiffs' claims. (Case Nos. 2:17-cv-00079, Doc. No. 40; 2:17-cv-00080, Doc. No. 50; 2:18-cv-00022, Doc. No. 35). Those Motions have been fully briefed by the parties and, for the reasons that follow, will be granted with respect to Plaintiffs' federal claims, but the Court will decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over their state law claims.

I. Background

Just looking at Plaintiffs' counter-statement of facts, one might…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Howe v. HowellDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2021
  2. Iles v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020
  3. McElhaney v. WilliamsDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2022
  4. Patricia Houser v. City of Alexandria, Tennessee, and Beth Tripp, in her official and individual capacityDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API