Legal Opinion

Ford v. Kuehne

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1928No. Docket No. 140PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

The testimony introduced on behalf of plaintiff tends to show: that he is a policeman of the city of Grand Rapids; while in the discharge of his duty, and while pursuing on a motorcycle a law violator, he was run into and seriously injured by defendant’s automobile, which attempted to turn into a private driveway without giving any signal or notice of such intention; that, under the charter and ordinances of the city, he was entitled to and was paid a pension for the time of disability; that he was not paid compensation under the workmen’s compensation act nor did he file any claim with or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Grand Rapids v. CrockerMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Dickey v. JacksonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. Hornburg v. MorrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Duncan v. BinghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  2. Harris v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Downie v. Kent ProductsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Alexander v. CreelDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1944
  5. Royer v. EskovitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API