Legal Opinion
United States v. Loren Adrian Sealey
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 21, 1994No. 94-10038Published
1Opinion of the Court
38 F.3d 1219
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Loren Adrian SEALEY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 94-10038.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 17, 1994.*
Decided Oct. 21, 1994.
MEMORANDUM**
1
Loren Adrian Sealey, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the denial of his Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a) motion to correct his…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gozlon-Peretz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. David L. FowlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Gregory Thompson, AKA Scott Wade MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992